It is a bit mind-blowing how skewed the coverage for Sanders has been compared to Clinton on the NY Times. Even when he wins multiple states like he did yesterday, they often put him in as an afterthought or present him negatively. And then they post additional articles with titles like "Clinton’s Growing Delegate Lead Is Nearly Unbeatable" just underneath. Finally, the Times editors have been caught making substantive changes to already published articles on Sanders to change the tone and perspective.

I hope they realize that only half of the states have voted so far in the primaries and this race for the Democratic nomination is FAR from over. If anything, the media's coverage of Sanders makes me support him that much more while liking Clinton and her ties to big money that much less.