reedmaniac.com

Spread the Wealth

Curiosity drives me to try many different things. An idea has been stewing in my mind for a couple days now, and I have decided to just try it and see what happens. Hopefully, it will not explode in my face.

On a fairly regular basis, usually about once or twice a month, I donate money to a person, charity, organization, or what have you. It ranges anywhere between giving an acquaintance a Flickr Pro account to donating a substantial amount of money to a non-profit. While I would never consider myself blessed, I am fortunate to have had a well paying job for a few years and frugal spending habits in relation to that income. My investments are still doing relatively well and my part time contract work pays more than my bills, and like a certain Mr. Barack Obama I believe in spreading the wealth around and helping others/causes I believe in.

But, this month I want someone else to choose. The election is over, and I would prefer if we could keep some of this energy and momentum going. For months, people were seriously invested in the future of their communities and government. They should continue to be so, for their entire life, not just when there is an election. Keep your civic life strong!

So, here's the deal. I am going to donate $1,000. Write a paragraph, an essay, or a proposal explaining to me where I should donate this money and why, and then post it in the comments. The one I deem the most worthy will get the money (and yes, that means all of my personal biases might come into play).

There are no real restrictions. It can be a person, family, group, non-profit, cause, organization, or possibly just investing it in something like green energy. However, keep your arguments mature, responsible, and lacking any sort of anger or hate; I want to see the best of humanity, not the worst. Have at it. Oh, and you have until Monday morning.

Update:

A Mr. Derek Jones pointed out over IM that writing a check != community action. To which I say: duh. Of course, you writing an argument for where my money should be donated is not actually community action. Instead, this, like much of what I write here politically, is meant to start thoughts and a discussion. To get people motivated to thinking about what could or should be done in their communities, small or great, local or global. I have also received emails from other people who have talked about their own donating or volunteering habits. Things I like to hear. So, yes, if those are the topics you wish to bring up, go ahead and say something in the comments.
– Posted: November 06, 2008, 04:09 pm
10 Responses to Spread the Wealth

Commenting has been disabled for this entry...

I recently found a great cause and fundraising event. Ever heard of Movember (http://movember.com)?

I found out about it just the other day and thought it sounded like fun and relevant, with me being male and all that. So I shaved off my goatee and mo’, which I had had for near 12 years and signed up! It really is my kind of fundraising…fun!

I would be honored if you would donate some money to Movember.

Thanks

It’s pretty interesting trying to think of a persuasive argument. There are so many worthy charities. Phil Knight just gave $100m to OHSU’s Cancer Center, for example. Should that instead have been Oxfam? I mean, should we invest all in the extreme stuff? Part of me says ACLU, but how can I value nebulous legal entanglements over clean water to a village with none? So, I welcome you to my quandary. Guess I am voting for Oxfam or Doctors Without Borders or similar. I suspect that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is well-organized and as such deserving of donations. Without a capable administration even the best causes offend my sense of efficiency.

By .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on November 06, 2008, 11:48 pm

Still thinking. I want to talk to Leslie about something first. But I also wanted to subscribe to comments to read other people’s votes. Can I link to your offer on my blog? All 10 of our readers might be interested. :)

I shall not submit an essay myself, as we’ve had a rousing private discussion, and my suggestion is more philosophical than practical, so instead I will implore people who participate in this exercise to instead of directing Paul to whom he should give the $1000, have him instead choose something that allows him to control how every cent of the $1000 is spent and where it goes.  This will be a greater challenge, as you will have to come up with something more specific than picking an organization, requiring either he or you to actually do something.  At minimum, you would have to choose an organization that will accept a stipulated donation, many of which will not, which should tell you something.

The administrative burden to provide stipulations on every donation is IMO unjustifiable.

By .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on November 07, 2008, 05:50 pm

Cameron, that supports my argument to come up with something other than giving to an organization.  Administrative waste is an inherent expense.

As for whether stipulations should be accepted, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to request that money donated for say, researching a diabetes cure, is only spent on that, and not on R&D;of other pharmaceuticals whose revenues will ostensibly be used to fund the “primary” cause.

Paul gives both time & money and I suspect that he researches how he gives both wisely. He’s just like that.

I’m going to throw in a charity that I like as a possibility and opportunity to do both and that’s Child’s Play, a charity started by a couple of gamers to fund Children’s Hospitals with things to improve the quality of patient’s life.

What’s nice about the Charity is that you can give money or purchase directly from a hospital’s wish list and have the items sent directly to them.

Portland’s Doernbecher Children’s Hospital and Legacy Emanuel Children’s Hospital both participate in Child’s Play. The items range from toys to books to video games. A $1000 would be the majority of requested books on either list, so my suggestion is that you buy one of those hospitals a bunch of books and offer time to do a reading session. I happen to know that little kids enjoy Uncle Paul reading to them and that despite a huge, ego-encrusted exterior, Uncle Paul loves giving in this manner.

Derek, I support giving to targeted programs whose missions you support, so on that we agree. As to avoiding giving money to organizations, what is the alternative? Local donations only, or only direct to individuals? Are you against taxes, too? Cause I am not too convinced by anarchism. I think organizations and administrations and governments do efficient and good social services, and provide ones that wouldn’t otherwise be available.

By .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on November 08, 2008, 06:39 pm

No, Cameron, I’m not advocating anarchy, I’m advocating thinking more deeply than picking an organization that advertises that it helps <cause X>.  Like governments, some work better than others, and corruption exists to different degrees in all of them.  If one supports an organization, they should have a good understanding of where the money will actually be spent, with research to back the claim.  And I think Leslie’s post above is an example of how that control can be exercised, even with the aide of a beneficial organization.

Wonderful, I misunderstood you and apologize for my flamish tone. I am all for critical analysis and data.

By .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on November 10, 2008, 05:53 pm
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.